As the Republican caucus in the House of Representatives now faces a decision on how to deal with the budget stopgap bill approved by the Senate on Friday, most commentators are asking whether or not the country can avoid a government shutdown as Tea Party-aligned members of the House GOP continue to signal their refusal to pass any budget measure that funds programs related to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, key portions of which are set to begin Tuesday.
In addition, lingering behind the threat of a temporary government shutdown is the possibly more severe tactic being considered by the GOP “hostage-takers” who—once again—are saying they will not approve an increase to the federal debt limit if a series of their economic proposals and budget demands are not met. If the so-called ‘debt ceiling’ is not raised by Congress, warn experts, the U.S. will be voluntarily defaulting on its debt obligations to its creditors and the result could be deeply destructive to the credit-rating of the U.S. and cause a new wave of financial pain in a still faltering economy.
Click Here: cheap all stars rugby jersey
These dual and competing threats by the Republican lawmakers, however—and the legislative processes and machinations of Washington, DC politics that many in the media are focused on—tend to miss out on asking one of the key questions at the center of this latest episode in what has become the “new normal” of lawmaking during the his presidency: Will Obama cave?
Though the president has repeatedly said he will “not negotiate” under these circumstances, it’s clear from GOP lawmakers that their reading of history shows that if they push enough, take hostages, and make belligerent demands for the sun, that the president might at least give them the moon.
As The Hill reports:
However, what was the lesson that GOP lawmakers took from the last showdown over the budget? If one forgets, following a scenario very similar to the current one that took place in 2012, President Obama offered to “not negotiate” by handing the Republicans cuts to key social programs—including Medicare and Social Security—in exchange for a conciliatory budget deal.
In fact, some progressive commentators, including Common Dreams contributor Jeff Cohen, argued that those describing Obama’s repeated “caving” to Republican demands were using the wrong word. Cohen wrote at the time:
Regardless, a so-called ‘Grand Bargain’ became the talk of the town, but few consistently argued that what it amounted to was a victory for the Republicans who used hostage tactics to make political gains despite their minority status in Washington. And as the Campaign for America’s Future fellow Richard Eskow wrote this week, the current situation carries all the same signatures:
In fact, as The Guardian reports, Obama on Friday said “he was willing to negotiate over government spending,” despite his refusal to respond to a laundry list of other GOP demands.
But if a reduction in spending on key programs continues to be on the chopping block, why wouldn’t the Republicans continue their push? As events unfold in the coming days, it might just become more clear what “not negotiating” with “hostage-takers” look like. And it’s unlikely to be pretty.